Reading:
Wrong way round When I try to write poetry My thoughts come out The wrong way round. Rhymes too take time To get exactly right, Sense and sound apposite. For me verbal perfection Entails hours of correction. This word here that one there: ‘That’s not what I meant!’ But why do I only know What I wanted after I’ve shunted The words a dozen times, Only to find it when I returned To the one I spurned A good half hour ago? To work in this way Is much easier today Than for our predecessors. We are fortunate to have Computers and word processors. Quills and parchment Or letters cut in stone or wood Made change of mind a disaster. So did those early masters Get it right from the start? Were their first thoughts Cogent, meaning be as it should From the very first moment? Every line conceived ‘just so’? Or was it ‘first rough notions In chalk on slate’ and only later Fair copies made from a litter Of scraps long since vanished? Once put into the right order The final version then garnished With some decorative Flourishes in the border To complete the fiction Of spontaneous diction? It’s so far back in history We shall never know. But even in more recent days With pen and ink commonplace And paper cheap, it’s still a mystery How they did it, even say Two hundred years into the past. Take one instance: Did Coleridge render His ‘Ancient Mariner’ In a fury of inspiration Pitch perfect, despite his haste, No hesitation or initial gestation At all? Not change one sentence? Printed, it looks like mastery But did he too make do With scratchings-out, use glue And scissors for cut-and-paste? Scholars would probably say so. But I worry it’s just me that’s slow.
